|
Editor's
Notebook, June 1, 2005
by T.W. Theodore
 |
|
T.W. Theodore
|
| he said 'the reason'
she was competive was her weight... |
So, there I was, enjoying my Sunday morning coffee and papers,
getting my last bit of all Danica all the time news about the upcoming
Indy 500, when BAM!, I was struck, rather forcefully, by an outrageous
statement by a former IndyCar driver. I was incensed and vowed
that I would never race in the Indy 500 if they let jerks like
Robby Gordon participate.
If you missed it, Gordon said that the reason Danica Patrick
was good was that she weighed less than the other drivers, which
gave her a weight advantage. He didn’t say ‘one reason’,
or ‘a reason’, he said ‘the reason’ she
was competitive was her weight. He also said that he would not
race at Indy against her. I went into major attack mode, planning
an Editor’s Notebook column about why that statement was
outrageous.
| Gordon’s comment
was the death rattle of a dying breed of man.... |
As the day progressed, however, I began to feel and see the overwhelming
tide of support for Danica and realized that Gordon’s comment
was the death rattle of a dying breed of man. The story was a DNS
and didn’t require rebuttal. It is important, however, for
us to look at how Gordon’s comment fits into the evolving
acceptance of women in motor sports. (I’m still a little
angry, though, so if you send me an email, I’ll send you
my top ten reasons why Robby Gordon is an asshole.)
Danica’s performance in the Indy 500 settled, forever,
the question of whether a woman can be competitive at the highest
level of motor racing. Janet Guthrie’s performances at Indy
in the 1970’s should have answered that question, but there
were a great many Gordon-like people involved in the sport at that
time. The tide turned against Janet, denying her the sponsorship
she needed and ending her career prematurely.
| It is important to recognize
what needs the mop.... |
Even with the strong performance by a woman in this year’s
Indy 500, those of us fighting for gender equality in motor racing
will be engaged in mopping up operations for years to come. It
is important to recognize what needs the mop.
So, let us be very clear about what Gordon meant. He was not
talking about weight; he was talking about gender. Gordon weighs,
according to himself, 200 pounds. Dan Weldon, the Indy 500 winner,
weighs 157 pounds. Tony Kanaan, the Indy 500 pole winner, weighs
145 pounds. Cristiano da Matta, a winning Champ Car driver, weighs
130 pounds.
Each man has an advantage, to varying degrees, over Gordon, but
he never contested the issue, even when he was competing against
them. He did, however, feel obliged to contest the issue when it
concerned a woman driver, who weighs 100 pounds, even though he
was not competing against her.
For years, we’ve heard that women, or ‘girls’ as
they are quaintly called, do not have the nerve or the aggression
(the balls) to win in motor racing. They don’t have the upper
body strength (in a sport that requires precision, endurance, clarity
of thought and vision, not arm strength). Now comes the notion
that the only reason women are competitive is because they are
smaller.
There are historical comparisons of note. Almost 100 years ago,
African Americans, or ‘colored folk’ as they were most
charitably called, were thought not to have the nerve (the balls)
to stand up in the boxing ring to a championship white boxer. Once
an African American proved that he did have the nerve, we were
told that the only reason he was competitive was because African
Americans were, essentially, brutes. It took more than a full generation
until it was firmly accepted that black boxers could be just as
good, or just as bad, as their white counterparts.
| ..watershed
in the acceptance of women in racing.... |
The fan response at Indy this Memorial Day weekend was a watershed
in the acceptance of women in racing. Three hundred thousand people
in the stands in Indianapolis , men and women, stood and cheered,
hoping to see a woman win the Indy 500. Millions more around the
world fervently wished for her victory.
But let us not become complacent. We’ve moved from the ‘women
can’t win’ to the ‘women can win, but it’s
only because…’ phase of the discussion. Listen for
the meaning behind the words. Learn to separate fact from bias.
Speak with good humor and with kindness to those whose prejudice
clouds their sense of reality. Perhaps Robby Gordon will, truly,
be the last gender jerk in motor racing and perhaps we can help
even him understand.
|